Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
In the News This topic comes up quite a lot on technology websites, but I generally try to steer clear from it as much as possible, since I'm not the one to talk about it (you know, with me being a man and all that), however, I feel it might be a good idea to just get my opinion out there and be done with it. The topic of women in IT is a hot-button issue, so let me just go out guns blazing: assuming women need special treatment, help, protection, and affirmative action is just as insulting and degrading as outright claiming women have no place in IT - maybe even more so.
Thread beginning with comment 519828
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Merits
by l3v1 on Tue 29th May 2012 07:07 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Merits"
l3v1
Member since:
2005-07-06

But if it turned out they did rule in a meritocracy, then perhaps they'd merit it after all, don't you think?


Well, I can't argue with that ;)

But then what's this about? I said "women would have much more prominent roles", how do you feel that's baseless?


I pointed at the implied opinion that a general meritocracy would directly mean women would have more prominent positions, which can't be either proved or disproved.

Edited 2012-05-29 07:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2