Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 30th May 2012 06:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520043
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
...implying that firing ten executives would bring the same savings as 2000 employees, hence the former are paid 200 times more?
), and typical RIM employee is certainly not society-average.
Hm, no. Canada might also have this problem, but not quite to the levels of "leading" US: apparently ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_pay#Canada ) the top 100 Canadian CEOs get paid 189x as much as an average Canadian - but of course not all executives at RIM are CEOs (even if RIM had a bit unusual situation with two CEOs
So we'd have to fire, I don't know, at least 50 of those at managerial positions? 100? 200?
(and while RIM clearly had some hiccups with its management and decision making processes ...I'm not sure if outright gutting them out would help much)