Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 11:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520123
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Radio
by JAlexoid on Thu 31st May 2012 19:15
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Radio"
We'll see. You know that a lot of governments depend on the good will of MICROS~1 to function. Never bite the hand that feeds you.
And don't rely on customers "waking up" and demanding a chance. They will always use what they are offered by a benevolent company that only wants their best.
Those who already denied following MICROS~1 will probably have a hard time finding hardware they can use in the future.
And don't rely on customers "waking up" and demanding a chance. They will always use what they are offered by a benevolent company that only wants their best.
Those who already denied following MICROS~1 will probably have a hard time finding hardware they can use in the future.
No. Sorry, just no. You don't know how much EU central administration hates Microsoft. There is quite literally an effort not to use Microsoft. There are lot of integration projects that don't even bother providing member states tools for integrating based on Microsoft technologies. (I personally and Richard Pawson of NakedObjects have had a chance to experience it)





Member since:
2006-10-08
That just sounds wrong, by two interpretations (maybe exaggerated, but potential future):
The first one being, a product in competition on a certain market needs the approval of the competitor. If the vendor of the concurrent product doesn't provide approval, the competing won't work.
Huh? Free market with competition anyone? Hello?
The second one may be similar to already established marketing and sales models. By purchasing something, you're not purchasing the thing physically in order to excercise your will on it (because it now belongs to you - you've paid for it). Instead, your payment allows you to exercise a limited set of rights on the device. The amount and kind of rights, as well as maybe their temporal availability, is controlled by the vendor of the product - the one you gave money to. This sounds a lot like a typical renting model for flats.
We'll see. You know that a lot of governments depend on the good will of MICROS~1 to function. Never bite the hand that feeds you.
And don't rely on customers "waking up" and demanding a chance. They will always use what they are offered by a benevolent company that only wants their best.
Those who already denied following MICROS~1 will probably have a hard time finding hardware they can use in the future.
Soon, it won't be about hacking software, but hacking hardware to bring it back into "normal state".