Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 11:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520187
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: This is Legen-,hope you're not lactose intolerant,-dary
by Alfman on Thu 31st May 2012 17:56
in reply to "RE[2]: This is Legen-,hope you're not lactose intolerant,-dary"
One shouldn't have to disable UEFI secure boot in the first place for alternate operating systems. There wouldn't be a complaint if the spec/certification required owners be able to change their keys to non-microsoft vendors....and of course the freedom to do it on ARM as well.
Edited 2012-05-31 18:03 UTC




Member since:
2010-04-30
I feel like I have to point out that the spec actually does NOT mandate this. The manufacturer can implement such a non-secure-boot option, but they are not required to. And if they aren't required to do that, well, feel free to guess how many manufacturers will do that. "
The spec doesn't mandate it, but Microsoft does. According to Windows 8 Hardware Certification Requirements: