Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 21:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520228
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And here is Linus' prediction on Google+:
"Prediction: instead of Oracle coming out and admitting they were morons about their idiotic suit against Android, they'll come out posturing and talk about how they'll be vindicated, and pay lawyers to take it to the next level of idiocy.
Sometimes I really wish I wasn't always right. It's a curse, I tell you."
And here is Linus' prediction on Google+:
"Prediction: instead of Oracle coming out and admitting they were morons about their idiotic suit against Android, they'll come out posturing and talk about how they'll be vindicated, and pay lawyers to take it to the next level of idiocy.
Sometimes I really wish I wasn't always right. It's a curse, I tell you."
"Prediction: instead of Oracle coming out and admitting they were morons about their idiotic suit against Android, they'll come out posturing and talk about how they'll be vindicated, and pay lawyers to take it to the next level of idiocy.
Sometimes I really wish I wasn't always right. It's a curse, I tell you."
From the updated article:
Update: Oracle has forwarded us a statement with its response as well:
Oracle is committed to the protection of Java as both a valuable development platform and a valuable intellectual property asset. It will vigorously pursue an appeal of this decision in order to maintain that protection and to continue to support the broader Java community of over 9 million developers and countless law abiding enterprises. Google's implementation of the accused APIs is not a free pass, since a license has always been required for an implementation of the Java Specification. And the court's reliance on "interoperability" ignores the undisputed fact that Google deliberately eliminated interoperability between Android and all other Java platforms. Google's implementation intentionally fragmented Java and broke the "write once, run anywhere" promise. This ruling, if permitted to stand, would undermine the protection for innovation and invention in the United States and make it far more difficult to defend intellectual property rights against companies anywhere in the world that simply takes them as their own.
------------------------------------------
Dear Mr Ellison. Stop being a cunt.





Member since:
2010-06-08
That's great! For now. Oracle probably will still file an appeal. I doubt Oracle would learn from all of this. Here is a good description of Oracle management corporate thinking from Bryan Cantrill:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zRN7XLCRhc#t=33m40s
Edited 2012-05-31 21:54 UTC