Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 11:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: I for one find it disturbing
by orestes on Fri 1st Jun 2012 12:41
in reply to "RE[5]: I for one find it disturbing"
RE[7]: I for one find it disturbing
by darknexus on Fri 1st Jun 2012 17:39
in reply to "RE[6]: I for one find it disturbing"
Yes because clearly running something other than Windows is going to be a cure all against pre-boot attacks. Take off the fanboy hat and think rationally for a bit. Secure boot processes are a step in the right direction
If only that were true. But how long do you think it's going to be before someone comes out with a bit of malware that gets signed with a rogue Microsoft key? And, since we the users won't be able to easily control what keys are in our hardware, that thing will just skip right through. How very secure. Open your eyes. Secureboot has nothing to do with security. Zero. It's security theater designed to give Microsoft the advantage. It's TSA for your computer. To hell with that.




Member since:
2006-12-05
Bullshit. More secure systems would be those that are running any operating system system NOT developed by Microsoft... and which are unplugged from the AC outlet 99.9% of the time.
Edited 2012-06-01 06:23 UTC