Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 21:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520367
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: APIs not copyrightable
by _txf_ on Fri 1st Jun 2012 23:07
in reply to "RE[2]: APIs not copyrightable"
But he never delivered. Mono is dying slowly now. Moonlight is already dead. Novell is dead, Finally Attachmate threw Mono in the dump where it belongs.
As much as I distrust MS, I find .net (as a technology) to be vastly superior to java so that extends to mono as well.
One does not have to own a piece of art to be able to appreciate it.
Edited 2012-06-01 23:08 UTC
RE[3]: APIs not copyrightable
by moondevil on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 08:33
in reply to "RE[2]: APIs not copyrightable"




Member since:
2008-04-18
You are right to feel uncomfortable. Any normal person would. But Microsoft don't have to break their promise. Their promise covered only the ECMA part of Mono. Microsoft never promised anything regarding the non-ECMA part of Mono. And that broke Miguel's heart because he had hoped that a complete promise would help him further infect Linux with Microsoft's crap. Subsequently Miguel promised he would split Mono in two parts (ECMA and non-ECMA) for legal reasons. But he never delivered. Mono is dying slowly now. Moonlight is already dead. Novell is dead, Finally Attachmate threw Mono in the dump where it belongs.