Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 2nd Jun 2012 23:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520588
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Interesting Side Point
by Neolander on Mon 4th Jun 2012 06:42
in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting Side Point"
Meanwhile, in the iOS world, a developer just writes to the latest version, knowing that most of devices in the wild will be on that version.
...and when Apple screw up an update, as they did with iOS 4 for older iDevices, users of perfectly working hardware have to install the knowingly broken update on their phone or PMP in order to use the latest software.
At some point in their lifetime, all OSs reach a level of maturity where updates do not matter so much anymore, as happened to Windows around the XP SP2 days. This cannot happen soon enough to iOS and Android.
Edited 2012-06-04 06:51 UTC
RE[3]: Interesting Side Point
by Neolander on Mon 4th Jun 2012 07:00
in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting Side Point"
Also, I don't think that you need ICS to get "The vast majority of the cool and competitive features in Android". As far as I can tell, for Gingerbread users, ICS is more of a big overall UI refinement (and a large resource hog) than a groundbreaking feature-rich release.
Edited 2012-06-04 07:01 UTC
RE[4]: Interesting Side Point
by zima on Tue 5th Jun 2012 22:12
in reply to "RE[3]: Interesting Side Point"





Member since:
2006-01-01
You totally don't get it.
The vast majority of the cool and competitive features in Android are not available in earlier versions so if only a small percentage of users upgrade it means developers need to write to some ancient version to support the bulk of the user base.
Meanwhile, in the iOS world, a developer just writes to the latest version, knowing that most of devices in the wild will be on that version.