Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520724
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by gmlongo
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 4th Jun 2012 13:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by gmlongo"
Please see http://bostonglobe.com
...which looks virtually identical to OSNews at 1920pix.
http://www.osnews.com/img/26032/uh.png
RE[4]: Comment by gmlongo
by vaette on Mon 4th Jun 2012 13:52
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by gmlongo"
They too could do more, but in Chrome on Linux maximized 1920px OSnews has 474 pixels wasted on each side, whereas the Boston Globe has 336 pixels wasted on each side. Meaning that OSnews uses about 51% of the space allocated to it, but the Boston Globe uses 65%. Certainly a better effort.
I think more the point that joshv was making though is that Boston Globe looks great at all widths less than 1440, using CSS selectors.
I think there are many arguments to be made about the suitability of Metro, but it is certainly also a failure of OSnews that it doesn't make good use of screen estate in maximized browsers. Many people, myself included, don't multitask that much when browsing the web.





Member since:
2006-03-18
Please see http://bostonglobe.com