Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 520805
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by gmlongo
by zima on Sun 10th Jun 2012 23:44
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by gmlongo"
I'm amazed that some people don't get another thing...
Those who point out it's a "fault" of OSNews layout don't really propose "widescreen pages of non-wrapping text" as an alternative - but more, say, a multi-column (more than 2) layout, as is typical in "wide" print magazines.
Edited 2012-06-10 23:45 UTC




Member since:
2005-11-16
Agreed. I'm amazed that some people don't get this.
On my 27" monitor browser windows typically use about 60% of the screen width. For some sites, such as those displaying large pictures, I'll maximise the window, but more often I find myself reducing the width even further.
Even spanning 60% of the screen width I find that a big block of text can be uncomfortable to read. I'll shrink it down so that the text width isn't any greater than it'd be in a paperback book. To me that makes a significant difference to my speed and enjoyment when reading.
I do the same in ebook readers, text editors, PDF viewers, and anything else where I'll be reading more than a page or two of text. Even for the simple task of consuming written words I'd find Metro's full screen limitations annoying and uncomfortable.