Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jun 2012 22:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 521119
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: innovation vs. litigation
by Neolander on Thu 7th Jun 2012 14:26
in reply to "RE[2]: innovation vs. litigation"
And even if you manage to avoid Windows on workstations, what you often end up using instead is OSX. Funding Apple is not necessarily better, as this article shows...
(Though with 10 years of service, my iMac from work certainly didn't bring Apple so much yearly average revenue
)
Edited 2012-06-07 14:36 UTC




Member since:
2011-01-28
WereCatf,
"To be honest, no matter what you do you're still financially supporting 'the bad guys.'"
The OP should stick to his principals but you are right too. It is very difficult to completely avoid Microsoft's monopoly.
You need professional accountants/lawyers/doctors/dentists/etc? Take a look at what they're running, it's always windows. Even if they don't need windows, it's usually the sole platform supported by the commercial apps they do need.
Windows is on embedded devices where there is no discernible evidence of it whatsoever. Though these are often given away by a BSOD. Some examples I have witnessed personally are: ATMs, arcade games, airport consoles, cable television guide channels, gasoline station consoles, cash registers.
The point being that some portion of what you spend will be making it's way into microsoft's account and there's very little one can do to control it.