Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jun 2012 01:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 521136
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by Morgan on Thu 7th Jun 2012 11:53
in reply to "RE[5]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
RE[6]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by Valhalla on Fri 8th Jun 2012 00:57
in reply to "RE[5]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
One datapoint suggesting that they are playing ball:
Playing ball? It wasn't as if they chose to open source the Hyper-V Linux code as they were forced to submit it because it was discovered that they'd been shipping closed source binaries with a Hyper-V Linux network driver which used statically linked GPL-licenced code.
And the only reason they created the Linux specific virtualization drivers to begin with is because their Hyper-V customers wanted to be able to run Linux efficiently.
Please don't try to paint this as a 'Microsoft did the right thing out of their own accord' thing.




Member since:
2008-08-09
One datapoint suggesting that they are playing ball: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2166123/microsoft-contribu...