Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jun 2012 22:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 521189
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Stephen!
by Alfman on Thu 7th Jun 2012 15:53
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Stephen!"
kwan_e,
Well, it still seems disingenuous to me to say "we believe in choice" when it was convenient and then turn around and kill customer choice.
As for the yes-men, I don't think they caused apple to eliminate choice (though they are certainly enablers). It's not like they would stop praising apple if apple chose to continue the mantra of "choice is good". In fact I think life would be a hell of a lot easier for fanboys if they didn't have to defend apple's attacks on consumer freedoms.




Member since:
2007-02-18
.
.
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxOp5mBY9IY
"We have taken a look a browsers out there and apple has decided to make internet explorer it's default browser on the macintosh. Since we believe in choice...since we believe in choice we're going to be shipping other internet browsers as well on the macintosh and the user can of course change their default should they choose to."
Actually, that second video paints a slightly different picture. You're right that as an underdog, "choice" was promoted. But the stifling of choice when they came across success is in no small part due to the attitude of people like those fanboys in the video who reflexively booed at anything not Apple.
It's a repeat of history. Even emperors who start out being the best emperor there ever was always succumbed to despotism when surrounded by yes men. That booing crowd of fanboys in the second video is a display of the sickness of unequivocal party allegiance.