Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jun 2012 23:55 UTC, submitted by Jeremy
Slackware, Slax has an in-depth interview with Patrick Volkerding. "The goal back when the project was started was to make it easy, and to keep things simple. But to paraphrase Einstein, you want to make things as simple as possible, but not simpler. There's a point of diminishing return when adding additional layers and interfaces, especially when it comes to system configuration. I've seen automated configuration do things like strip out all the comments in a config file, or worse just completely rewrite the thing because you had the nerve to try editing it outside of the approved system. And I do feel like Slackware has been shafted in some of the reviews over the years, largely because there's a tendency to review only the installer and not the system itself. There is certainly a learning curve, but that's true for all versions of Linux. We've never tried to make things hard, but perhaps we also haven't tried to prevent people from shooting themselves in the foot. Things like aliasing rm to 'rm -i' don't help the user learn to be careful." Patrick gets it.
Thread beginning with comment 521480
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Pat and Slack
by bradley on Sun 10th Jun 2012 00:54 UTC
Member since:

I started using Slack at version 9.0 and still using it today. For me... she's always reliable and stable. I to feel that the complaint about Slackware not having a package manager that handles dependencies is very miniscule at best. Slackware as an operating systems is just SOLID! I've stated a couple of years ago... " Other than BSD which I also use, I couldn't live without SLACKWARE ". So PAT don't go anywhere and keep SLACKIN'.


Reply Score: 1