To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As another poster said, I think the editor was more important to making VB friendly than anything having to do with the language itself. At that time, for static GUI layout/design, VB was the easiest thing to use bar none. Unlike the situation with .net, microsoft's VC and VB environments were not created equal. VB was a superior toolset. This lead myself and probably countless others to use VB instead of VC.
Delphi? PowerBuilder? The only thing special about VB was that it had Microsoft's logo on the box... But Delphi had a real language under the hood, and PowerBuilder didn't pretend to be a real language.
"So let's give credit where credit is due: VB6 allowed a lot of people to write software in very little time, which no other mainstream development system at the time did to such a large audience."
Well, at the time of VB6 Delphi was around doing it better ha ha ha.
I would say VB3 should be given that credit as it really allowed windows to take off with many many apps.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Everyone on a high horse today? So VB6 is not a nicely designed language, it takes shortcuts and is opportunistic. What language isn't? It's not like we're using Smalltalk or Haskell, we mostly write code in C, C++ and Java, which aren't prime examples of academic beauty either. To this day, C++ compilers from different vendors will not necessarily agree on what code they will compile or not.
So let's give credit where credit is due: VB6 allowed a lot of people to write software in very little time, which no other mainstream development system at the time did to such a large audience.