To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The idea that Elop is some kind of trojan horse planted there by Microsoft and not the choice of the board of Nokia is just lame and stupid. They hired Elop because they were going with Microsoft, not the other way around.
His 'burning platform' memo was probably the single dumbest action of any CEO of the last decade, though. Way to remove all faith in all they currently had, and any potential plan B.
I think his Burning the Platform memo is what makes people (me included) he's a trojan horse planted by MS planted. I sure disagreed with his plan (but who cares what I think), and thought that there's no way this could work.
I'm not disagreeing with you. and you're probably right.. I'm just saying this has been such a blunder, one would almost expect it was done on purpose.
Even if you are right, the shareholders of Nokia should be very pissed at Elop, unless the strategy now is to sell to MS and get rich.




Member since:
2006-01-10
I somehow hope that when that day comes when Microsoft tries to buy Nokia or it's assets (patents), this debacle of Nokia destroying it's own brand is investigated. This had to be the strategy Elop was planning for, as we all predicted this would be the outcome.
Nokia is a handset company. It should have worked harder to compete against iOS and Android. Or just started making handsets with Android (and WP7) on them. Nokia had all to loose, and little to gain with this marriage to WP7. If somehow WP7 penetrated the market as they and MS projected other OEM's would be whittling away at the Nokia market still.
Edited 2012-06-15 22:26 UTC