Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 16th Jun 2012 17:52 UTC
Windows Adrian Kingsley-Hughes pens a rant on Windows 8, calling it 'awful': "I'm now ready to sum up my Windows 8 experience with a single word: awful. I could have chosen a number of other words - terrible, horrible, painful and execrable all spring to mind - but it doesn't matter, the sentiment is the same." I've been using Windows 8 Release Preview on both my ZenBook and my regular desktop since its release, and here's my short review: "I like it." Issues a-plenty, but for what is essentially a 1.0 release - not bad. It's a hell of a lot better than other releases which were similar in scope (Mac OS X 10.0, KDE 4.0).
Thread beginning with comment 522423
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Saving this
by nt_jerkface on Sun 17th Jun 2012 01:15 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Saving this"
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26

There's always a crowd people who blindly fall for new and shiny and get upset with the guy who points out that the emperor is actually naked.

Windows 8 is a waste of time for enterprise and Microsoft cannot afford to ignore that market.

We're talking about billions of dollars here. For every Windows 8 defender who takes pride in embracing the golden linen of "change" there is a hard nosed CIO who will ask what exactly will offset the increased user training costs. Sinofsky still hasn't answered this question and you can live in la-la tablet land with him until Windows 8 drops along with Microsoft's revenue. Then it will be back to reality and those who were called "afraid of change" will be seen as realistic thinkers whose concerns should have been heeded. Windows 8 defenders will be viewed as vain and completely disconnected from the financial realities of a company like Microsoft and enterprise computing in general.

Just because YOU don't mind the start screen doesn't mean a Fortune 500 hundred company with 100 start menu shortcuts in a shared system image thinks it's f--king jolly to dump them on a single screen with animated icons and then retrain each user to re-learn where their programs are. Office workers are notoriously fickle and will drain thousands hours of support costs over something like this. That's real money, not ill feelings on a tech forum.

Oh but YOU don't mind it, YOU probably spend most the time in a browser and have no consideration for these things. Well don't feel bad, neither does the Windows president.

Edited 2012-06-17 01:19 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[4]: Saving this
by tylerdurden on Sun 17th Jun 2012 02:39 in reply to "RE[3]: Saving this"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

And it is always interesting to see so many people who can't cope with change to become so emotionally vested on a field like IT, where change happens at almost exponential rates.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Saving this
by nt_jerkface on Sun 17th Jun 2012 15:28 in reply to "RE[4]: Saving this"
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

I'm not seeing that actually.

I'm seeing people who deal with change on a daily basis and can distinguish productive change from change as part of a corporate strategy that doesn't benefit end users

Embracing all change is idiotic. Or may be you think the people who rejected Microsoft Bob early on were afraid of change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

Reply Parent Score: 3