Linked by Elv13 on Sun 17th Jun 2012 10:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 522514
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It is going to take a year or more before people know they should ask what type of Windows it is running so they can run their existing applications on it.
It is like Windows Vista, even "your grandmother" would ask if it was running Vista and wouldn't buy it if she couldn't get something else on it.
It is like Windows Vista, even "your grandmother" would ask if it was running Vista and wouldn't buy it if she couldn't get something else on it.
And now everybody loves Vista SE.
People might yet love Win9, after grumbling for some time about Win8, even if 9 will be mostly just Win8 SE / Metro 2.0.




Member since:
2008-04-10
While it's already bad enough that Microsoft is requiring OEMs to use UEFI on their Windows 8 machines, it's downright disgusting that they have mandated it be completely locked on ARM devices, more so that they have the leverage to demand that. The justification is that it isn't anti-competitive on ARM because Windows lags behind on tablets, but that argument collapses when you consider there may (will) be ARM desktops and ultrabooks (well, Intel owns the word "ultrabook", but a rose by any other name...). Microsoft still dominates that market, and consumers really are too dumb to understand what "CPU architecture" means (I dropped that term to a customer by accident, recently, and he thought I meant the form of the case), and why their Windows will have less capabilities than their friend's.