Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jun 2012 00:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 522853
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If their goal is to convince people that Microsoft sells vaporware, then not shipping a single Surface could do it.
If their goal is to convince Dell/HP/Compaq/Acer/etc. that Microsoft is going to compete with their own OEM customers, then Surface could do it.
If their goal is to reinforce the idea that Zune, Kin, etc. were not flukes and that Microsoft really can't compete with Apple outside of the traditional desktop, then having insignificant sales of Surface could achieve that goal.
Because make no mistake: between the Magnesium+PVD with micron tolerances, the gorilla glass and the fact they need to avoid competiting with their own OEM, expect a very, very high price, even if MS tries to sell it at a loss like a game console. Why do you think nodody pulled it before? Eh.
It is simply a myth that magnesium cases, gorilla glass etc are very expensive. A magnesium case is simply die cast and CNC machined by an OEM supplier - the cost is only a couple of bucks.
A couple of years ago I sourced high end (Rolex quality) stainless steel watch bracelets in China. They cost a mere 59 cents each in bulk.




Member since:
2009-06-20
That is the biggest problem, and the only page they still haven't taken from Apple's book: one should not present a product without a price and a shipping date.
People are talking about the Surface, but how long? And how will they react, months from now, when they will discover the steep price of the tablet? Because make no mistake: between the Magnesium+PVD with micron tolerances, the gorilla glass and the fact they need to avoid competiting with their own OEM, expect a very, very high price, even if MS tries to sell it at a loss like a game console. Why do you think nodody pulled it before? Eh.