To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If you are working with other people who work with COBOL, it helps to have a working knowledge. I feel like every language has its own good features and bad that give me a broader idea of what's possible in a language. My university mostly taught Ada, and as a result many CS students were completely ignorant of very common features in other more common languages and their use of those languages suffered as a result.
COBOL is a zombie language. It will never be completely killed. It will always rise up out of the mainframe to eat the brains of recent CS grads.
Even as someone who writes a good number of web plumbing, I run into it every now and then. Some people I talk to just *assume* I'm also writing my system in COBOL.
A truly endangered language would be something like SNOBOL or PL/1.
Yes! I took PL/1 in school in the 70's (Yes I AM old). It was supposed to be the one language to rule them all. COBOL was better at character data, Fortan for numeric. PL/1 was good at both - WOOT! PL/1 was strange in that there were no reserved words. You could have a variable name that matches a control word, and the compiler would "know" the difference by context(although doing so was discouraged)!
The hell????
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_PL/1





Member since:
2005-07-06
I was hoping to read another COBOL article...