Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jun 2012 22:17 UTC
Legal I stopped following all the patent trolling in the mobile industry months ago because, you know, I have a life, but apparently some big ruling just got handed down in the United States: using three software patents, a patent troll from Cupertino has been given an injunction on Samsung's Galaxy Nexus, imposing a ban on the device. This patent trolling has to stop, blah, blah, we've all been here before. If you need me, I'll be over there on the sofa remembering the good old days when Cupertino was famous for great products, instead of infamous for its patent troll.
Thread beginning with comment 524423
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
grahamtriggs
Member since:
2009-05-27

On the very front page of this website there's an article which praises Apple for their contribution to the smartphone market. Apple undoubtedly innovated in this area, and I think its pigheaded to simply brush aside those innovations.


Innovation? Really? No doubt that Apple have changed the smartphone market dramatically. But being the first to demonstrate that something can be viable and desirable, is not the same as innovating.

Take a look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone#Early_years

The only real difference between IBM's Simon (1992), and the iPhone is the 15 years of technology and manufacturing advances that made it possible, and Google technology. Conceptually, they are the same device - multifunction, touchscreen only.

And even if you want to talk about multi-touch gestures, Apple certainly didn't invent them. Apple *bought* the company that did most of the work in the early 2000s, only 2 years before launching the iPhone.

Although Pierre Wellner published a paper covering the same ground - in 1991.

No doubt Apple have pushed the boundaries of what is physically achievable at (high end) consumer prices, and built a formidable business. And they make some very good products. But they are nowhere near as innovative as they have successfully fooled people into believing.

Reply Parent Score: 11

Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

You can be innovative in how you execute, bringing something to mass market, making it consumable, and usable. That's something to be lauded.

Sure there have been touch screens, and gestures, and whatever else, but there are very specific nuances in Apple's applications of these concepts if you look beyond the abstracts of the patents they hold. There is some real thoughtfulness.

To me, being able to bring all this together into a cohesive product at the time was unspeakable. Apple shook the mobile world hard, and altered the roadmap of every mobile company in the industry.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Fergy Member since:
2006-04-10

You can be innovative in how you execute, bringing something to mass market, making it consumable, and usable. That's something to be lauded.

You can't patent what you just mentioned. So Apple has no right to patent idea's that they got from other companies.
Idea patents are just indefensible

Reply Parent Score: 10

akrosdbay Member since:
2008-06-09

"On the very front page of this website there's an article which praises Apple for their contribution to the smartphone market. Apple undoubtedly innovated in this area, and I think its pigheaded to simply brush aside those innovations.


Innovation? Really? No doubt that Apple have changed the smartphone market dramatically. But being the first to demonstrate that something can be viable and desirable, is not the same as innovating.
"

Bullshit. That is the definition of innovation.

n·no·vate   [in-uh-veyt] Show IPA verb, in·no·vat·ed, in·no·vat·ing.
verb (used without object)
1.
to introduce something new; make changes in anything established.


The anti-apple pro android shills are out is full force with no understanding of what things are.. OSnews jumped the shark ever since Thom took over. It's become the gossip rag of the technology world.

Reply Parent Score: 1