Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jun 2012 22:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524473
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Gone fishing
by Gone fishing on Sat 30th Jun 2012 08:03
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Gone fishing"
Prior art is a tricky thing in patent law.
Allowing abuse, so that unprincipled companies can get spurious patents to stifle competition. Competitors can then both be harmed by the application of spurious patents and the process of overturning them. However, its not hard to see where this will go. When the developing economies are sufficiently important they will not tolerate paying an IP Tax to US companies for trivia like slide to unlock or making a rectangular phone with rounded corners. The US patent system will be rejected in total and then US companies that have generated real innovation by serious R&D will suffer, as will the American people and the West in general, but who cares if Apple can make a quick buck now - right?




Member since:
2005-11-29
This is Samsung we're talking about. They're not exactly broke. I'm fully confident that unless their lawyers are incompetent, they would've pointed out any prior art they were made aware of. If some existed.
Prior art is a tricky thing in patent law.