Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 30th Jun 2012 19:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524637
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: not a ptatent troll
by Soulbender on Sun 1st Jul 2012 05:51
in reply to "RE[3]: not a ptatent troll"
I think I can use the term patent troll when Apple engages in patent troll behaviour.
Sure, you can do whatever you want but it devalues the real meaning when you apply it like that.
It's not like I can
make the multibillion dollar corporation cry.
make the multibillion dollar corporation cry.
That's not what we're saying.
RE[5]: not a ptatent troll
by M.Onty on Sun 1st Jul 2012 10:30
in reply to "RE[4]: not a ptatent troll"





Member since:
2005-06-29
There actually is no set definition of patent troll. If Apple fanatics get to come up with fairy tales of Google stealing, I think I can use the term patent troll when Apple engages in patent troll behaviour.
It's not like I can make the multibillion dollar corporation cry.