To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: copying is anti innovation
If it looks, sounds, and walks like a duck...It must be a duck. There are limitations to how an automobile can be designed due to regulations, roads, fuel economy, etc. The point is a cell phone does not need to look and behave so similar to a competitors popular device as to infringe on their patents. There is no reason a company shouldn't be able to safeguard against these vulture companies and the reason they should be able to apply for patents of unique scope.
If you want an all out open free market, then the cheapest crap will probably win, destroy the innovative company making quality products, and in the end only crap companies are left with subpar products.
I believe in competition but come on at least try to do something innovative with your product instead of just copy something that's popular and try to sell at a discount. Thats the way to the bottom.



Member since:
2007-02-17
An Android phone is not a copy of an iPhone, it is a work-alike. Just as a GM vehicle is not a copy of a Ford, it is a work-alike. Likewise, Airbus aircraft are not copies of Boeing aircraft, they are work-alikes.
There are myriad products on the market which are not copies of competitor products, they are built differently but they look and work in a similar way to produce similar functionality and performance.
It is the whole basis of a capitalist free market economy that there are multiple similar products competing against each other in open competition. Supply and demand. Competition is good.
Are you saying that you do not believe in a free market economy?
Edited 2012-07-01 23:33 UTC