Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Jul 2012 22:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524887
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I would not name Meego unproven. The N9 sold well and Nokia still has the knowledge inhouse to pick it up again, put it on hardware and sell products within short time.
For network-effects the WP7 experiment did show that this is not the selling point. You can partner with a giant like Microsoft and yet fail (in fact it seems partners of Microsoft failing is more the rule then an exception).
What they should do is to pick what they have, Symbian and Meego, sell products with them and give Android a try too. Do it like Samsung (Android, Bada, Tizen) and be not that stupid to put all eggs again into only one basket.
Edited 2012-07-03 10:32 UTC
The N9 sold well and Nokia still has the knowledge inhouse to pick it up again, put it on hardware and sell products within short time.
From what I hear from my Finnish friends, Nokia no longer has that knowledge. Elop's cost cutting plans have been very effective at weeding out that knowledge.
But hey, Finnish startups got a very good injection of prime talent.
Edited 2012-07-03 12:15 UTC





Member since:
2008-08-19
Maybe, but it still beats the alternative. Because in a world where mobile developers code for iOS and Android and ignore WP, they're certainly not going to bother supporting a new and unproven Nokia-only platform.