Linked by Radio on Mon 2nd Jul 2012 19:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524952
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
Instead of a handful of eyes looking at it, a potentially large number of eyes can look at it and maintain it.
I guarantee you that Samsung's SoC drivers have a lot more interest than just Android engineers if they're opened up. You can get a groundswell of maintainers this way.
I never really understood the tying of the drivers to Android. Seems like a pointless dependency.
This way Android is free from driver cruft, and a Linux kernel version comes with an implicit guarantee of hardware support.
You can take 4.1, back port it to a Kernel revision with your drivers, and get functionality.
Of course, I'm just conjecturing here so if I'm mistaken I'd welcome the insight.