Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jul 2012 09:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 524979
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
End of the day ASUS is merely an assembler - why doesn't Nokia go after the parts supplier failing to pay the necessary royalties on the hardware sold?
I've often wondered about this as well on numerous occasions. In this case, why not accuse Broadcom* who supposedly make the Wifi (+ Bluetooth) chipset?
Then again, I don't really know how this sort of thing works. Also, Nokia haven't really started any legal proceedings. Sure, a statement like this is usually followed by a bunch of overweight lawyers having a field-day, but let's just give Nokia the benefit of the doubt for now.
* according to the component analysis by Anandtech in their mini-review of the Nexus 7.
Edited 2012-07-03 13:06 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
Regardless of whether they're software or hardware patents, I would have thought that such things as the Nokia and the Motorola ones would be getting paid on a per-unit costing at the parts manufacturer end rather than the final assembly point. End of the day ASUS is merely an assembler - why doesn't Nokia go after the parts supplier failing to pay the necessary royalties on the hardware sold? from what it appears it would be like AMD making an Intel compatible implementation of a technology but Intel deciding to go after Dell or HP instead of AMD in regards to patents.
Edited 2012-07-03 12:09 UTC