Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jul 2012 09:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525029
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Responsibility to Share Holders
by shmerl on Tue 3rd Jul 2012 18:11
in reply to "RE[2]: Responsibility to Share Holders"
Nokia is sacking people like there is no tomorrow.
Who is there to blame? Nokia's execs killed Meego for MS's bribe. Many technical experts inside Nokia told their execs that it'll basically spell doom for the company. Did they care? Wise people left Nokia right after Elop's burning platform memo.
Edited 2012-07-03 18:13 UTC
RE[4]: Responsibility to Share Holders
by zima on Mon 9th Jul 2012 23:59
in reply to "RE[3]: Responsibility to Share Holders"
Who is there to blame? Nokia's execs killed Meego for MS's bribe. Many technical experts inside Nokia told their execs that it'll basically spell doom for the company.
I wonder how you'd know that...
Anyway, generally, stop living in fantasy world. Sure, maybe going exclusively with WP wasn't the best decision for Nokia - but the long-running, way over-schedule Maemo/Meego effort was, realistically, unlikely to change the fortunes of the Nokia behemoth at that point either.
Edited 2012-07-10 00:05 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
How much Nokia is worth is directly linked to their share price.
Nokia is sacking people like there is no tomorrow. R+D costs MUST be recouped or its not financially viable to maintain the workforce doing it.
In your ideal world, Nokia spend all the money on the development of tech then allow everyone to use it for free? Great to say, but in practice if you worked at Nokia (and I know many that do) would you rather be employed or Nokia not pursue revenue?
I wont even start on how many normal people have their savings linked to this company