Linked by nej_simon on Wed 4th Jul 2012 22:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525390
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
When you compare to Apple then even Microsoft is not good in profit margins.
[...]
Or do you compare with Apple again? :-)
This is what I actually wrote: "... not that good with profit margins for quite some time, also when taking into account specific device segments of course (because it obviously doesn't make sense to compare S30 and iOS devices)"
(additional emphasis added)
...but hey, go ahead at slice my whole post like you did just above, jumping on carefully selected quotes just so you can feel good in proving a point.
They made huge profits year by year for more then a decade. Elop took over and within months its billions of lose.
Now the all in one question: How is that better then your unfunded personal "does not look good" impression?
[...]
Alright. That is why Nokia was number #1 so long till Elop took over?
Fact is, those hundreds of millions weren't huge at all when compared to revenue - Nokia was balancing not too far from losses (for such big company, which such big money turnover) for many years, performing closer (in returns per investment, R&D and such) to manufacturers which were sinking or sunk (well, before those did that), than to really successful ones. Those aren't my personal impressions but their financial performance...
I point out the dysfunctions and you seem to be willing to just brush them off, in each instance, with the sacred cow of market share (in devices sold) and (overall marginal, really) profits.
Sure, even such profits could keep Nokia afloat by itself, absolutely - but unfortunately that's not how modern market place works (overall, the whole corporate, shareholders culture - you might not like it, I might not like it, but that won't make it go away)
Nokia has a long history of selling divisions BTW, it reinvented itself many times over after stumbling here and there. Maybe it's just another stage.
No. The Elop-effect is if you combine the Osborn and the Ratner effect at the same time.
So, yes, that's a new variant...
I tell you a secret. Its like that in every larger cooperation. Just read those stack-management article that was on osNews some days ago and keep in mind that inside Nokia things where not as bad like they are inside of e.g. Microsoft and yet the first one dies and the second survives.
So, it was bad like that (still, how are you so certain of lower severity than within MS?), but it's still the Canadian ...OK.
Just look how the forecasts for Nokia where before Elop took over. The common believe was that Nokia may lose 5% marketshare till 2013, not that they are dead that time!
Actually, the specific source I linked predicted pretty much just that, a very rapid downfall...
Right, as if Nokia didn't have their own activities in China...
I think you mean Vietnam? That is not where Lumias are manufactored. Nokia does not use there own factories for Lumia. I am not aware of Nokia factories in China but maybe I am mistaken.
As if Nokia doesn't make anything except Lumias? Nokia has major activities in China, probably one of few factories not in the danger of closure ...it's telling that you apparently haven't even heard about them.
A new Nokia R&D in china? Never ever. Not to my knowledge. I doubt that and think you maybe confuse Nokia with something else. Please give sources.
Very telling... see, it's clear that I follow what goes around Nokia, and you just don't, you repeat popular mythos.
Sources are at nokia.com and (particularly with regards to R&D centre) at conversations.nokia.com (which I like to follow regularly for a long time) - do a google site search there or smth...