Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jul 2012 23:08 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525434
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Really? I have read of several news articles of samsung suing Apple over patents. Do those not count? Unless you don't consider those to be "offensive", which is oh so subjective.
There is nothing subjective about this in any way, shape, or form. Apple punches first, Samsung punches back. Apple is the aggressor, Samsung the defendant. The only people who find this subjective are those with an agenda.
Or is it ok because Apple sued first?
If you punch me in the face, you WILL get a punch back. That's called defending oneself.
There is nothing subjective about this in any way, shape, or form. Apple punches first, Samsung punches back. Apple is the aggressor, Samsung the defendant. The only people who find this subjective are those with an agenda.
Thats not what I meant. Offensive is a subjective word. What one person finds offensive someone else may not.
If you punch me in the face, you WILL get a punch back. That's called defending oneself.
No that is not defending oneself that is revenge. There is a difference.




Member since:
2006-02-19
Really? I have read of several news articles of samsung suing Apple over patents. Do those not count? Unless you don't consider those to be "offensive", which is oh so subjective.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/12/16/samsung_sues_apple_ov...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/samsung-apple-south-korea_...
Or is it ok because Apple sued first?