Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jul 2012 23:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525526
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-13
There is no need to radically change the entire US patent system - just the system for software patents.
The US mandatory patent pool for aviation works very well.
Many patents are non-trivial and very complex. Pharmceuticals, for example, are typically extremely slow (~14 years) and extremely expensive ($500m+) to bring to market. That is why these products need such a long patent protection process.