Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Jul 2012 22:05 UTC, submitted by Mbg
Thread beginning with comment 526265
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: IÃ��ïÂÂ&iques
by Nelson on Tue 10th Jul 2012 22:53
in reply to "RE[5]: IÃ��ïÂÂ&iques"
I'd much prefer someone comes up with an approach with clear improvements and then submit it as a standard. I just think it could use a lot more thought than currently exists.
Especially when inefficiencies translate into monetary costs I can't blame some companies for being anemic about implementing them.




Member since:
2010-06-08
If you look at it this way, e-mail is also far from ideal (not secure enough, prone to identity spoofing, spamming and etc.). But since it's a standard - the benefit of interoperability outweighs other things, and providers work on filters and other fixes for the flaws in e-mail design in order not to get into the walled garden mess again. May be XMPP is not ideal, but it's the only common and open standard so far.