Linked by moondevil on Wed 11th Jul 2012 22:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526546
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That is why Apple should have allowed more participation from the community. Older macs could be used with Gnu-Darwin, Pure Darwin or some other Unixoid combination of GNU/BSD userland and Apple's kernel instead of render them useless. [...]
But user contributed XNU unixoids are doomed without Apple's help. Puredarwin could be a place to start.
But user contributed XNU unixoids are doomed without Apple's help. Puredarwin could be a place to start.
OpenDarwin (of which Pure Darwin is an offshot) had some backing from Apple. Thing is, uptake by the community was nil, there is no interest.
Once you throw out OS X userland, there's nothing particularly compelling about what's left - if you're going to use more typical *nix userlands, GUIs, you might as well just use some BSD or Linux.





Member since:
2006-01-22
That is why Apple should have allowed more participation from the community. Older macs could be used with Gnu-Darwin, Pure Darwin or some other Unixoid combination of GNU/BSD userland and Apple's kernel instead of render them useless. With open source drivers at least they could have used them without 3D acceleration. A VESA framebuffer or a user supported 2d accelerated driver can do a lot of stuff (developoment,simulations and even browsing and document writing). But if they have implemented a proper UEFI, at least they could have used a generic GOP driver.
But user contributed XNU unixoids are doomed without Apple's help. Puredarwin could be a place to start.