Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jul 2012 16:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526664
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Estimate might be too low
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 13th Jul 2012 17:48
in reply to "RE[5]: Estimate might be too low"
RE[7]: Estimate might be too low
by Nelson on Fri 13th Jul 2012 17:51
in reply to "RE[6]: Estimate might be too low"
Nope. It uses the Lumia 710s Average Selling Price and Nokia Q1 results, specifically regional earnings out of the US.
Edit: HEY even Tomi agrees http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/04/who-wants-numb...
Thom, I think its time to mark this article as misleading. It takes data from two independent sources and mashes them into some Frankenstein analysis. The two sources by the way, having reporting cutoffs of a month apart (May vs June)
It also, as I've shown, uses impossible numbers.
Edited 2012-07-13 17:54 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-29
So do you think Nokia sold zero Lumia 900s on ATT?
Nokia's own Q1 numbers show they sold 300k Lumia 710s alone during the same time frame they allegedly sold a total of 300k Lumia's TOTAL.