Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jul 2012 16:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526666
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Estimate might be too low
by Beta on Fri 13th Jul 2012 18:43
in reply to "RE[7]: Estimate might be too low"
Thom, I think its time to mark this article as misleading.
I think its well past the time to mark you as misleading. You spent a large part of the comments saying how one persons numbers cant be trusted, yet then use them to agree with yourself… you could at least be consistent. I encourage you to back up any comments above with more than ‘everyone knows’
We get it, you have a thing for WP.
RE[9]: Estimate might be too low
by Nelson on Fri 13th Jul 2012 18:54
in reply to "RE[8]: Estimate might be too low"





Member since:
2005-11-29
Nope. It uses the Lumia 710s Average Selling Price and Nokia Q1 results, specifically regional earnings out of the US.
Edit: HEY even Tomi agrees http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/04/who-wants-numb...
Thom, I think its time to mark this article as misleading. It takes data from two independent sources and mashes them into some Frankenstein analysis. The two sources by the way, having reporting cutoffs of a month apart (May vs June)
It also, as I've shown, uses impossible numbers.
Edited 2012-07-13 17:54 UTC