Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Jul 2012 01:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526951
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The latin alphabet is largely unchanged, at least in regard to capital letters (or bookstaves).
But not for several millennia ...well, OK, there is some ambiguity of meaning with that word, but it usually tends to mean more than 2 or 3 (with "few" used more for smaller amounts). Making Latin borderline, at best (plus still unusual, with relative longevity; NVM largely incomprehensible past ~font styles that I mentioned)
Edited 2012-07-19 00:02 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
But we did redesign the alphabet, numerous times - no alphabet is that (several millenia) old in unchanged form. Plus, even some not-too-old, purely graphical forms of "our" alphabet are often barely discernible, for us not used to them (for example, after my grandfather I have some ~century old books in a form of Blackletter, so just in the German variant of Latin alphabet ...thing is, I'm basically unable to read them at all)
And you did have an alphabet of your own, in Scandinavia, with runes ...I'm mostly descended from the only major European group of people (and more broadly, within the Mediterranean cultural background) who, as far as historians can tell, most likely didn't have any writing system in the full meaning of the term ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Christian_Slavic_writing and PL article is more extensive, GTranslate works bearably).