To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
version control systems and dropbox-like sync is not rocket science and microsoft should have beaten the market with a modern product, not continued lagging behind. they seem not even close to a modern solution like you propose. it will take someone new to eat their lunch. and all the potential upstarts I knew about have been acquired and dissolved.
http://sharepoint.microsoft.com, also known as Microsoft Office SharePoint Server. It does centralized, webaccessible storage with built-in version control and workflow (among soooo many other things). It even has a free version called Windows SharePoint Services and a subscription based version called Office 365 / SharePoint Online.
This is not 1997 anymore.
(and for dropbox (home) they have skydrive)
Edited 2012-07-17 11:03 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
Actually it would be a good thing if MS-Office was not ported to Metro. The way most people work with MS-Office is a copy of the work flow people used around 1900 when the first typewriters became available. The only difference is that back then the information produced was hidden away and forgotten to never be found again in physical binders and filing cabinets instead of their windows desktop equivalents.
What we need today is software that makes it easy to search, combine and recombine information, and link various items of information together. In many cases wiki-like tools would make a lot more sense. MS office makes it tempting to save various copies of the same document on different machines or on different places, and in the people can't figure out what version of the document that is the valid one.
The problem gets worse the more devices we use. We might also want to view the information in different ways depending on what device we use. What we need is to maintain one version of the our documents preferably in some sort of cloud based service.