Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 17th Jul 2012 04:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527238
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Always those very few who masquerade themselves have something against stats - you know, there's any easy way to correct the error... (but don't expect any significant changes)
Anyway, not sure why the title of your response to MikeCarter is "Exactly" - while his point was clearly that, for estimating what general population uses on their PCs, some data sources (like web hits on ~Wikipedia) are almost certainly much more statistically valid than others (Distrowatch, your VM servers - BTW those: http://w3techs.com/blog/entry/debian_is_now_the_most_popular_linux_... )