Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Jul 2012 17:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527252
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Negative advertising is also illegal, btw.
I don't think this is true. I believe the standard in most countries is whether its false, deceptive, and/or misleading. For example, I'd say the "I'm a PC, I'm a Mac" campaign was a negative ad campaign in the commercial context. Negative ad campaigns in the political context are way too common. But, political ads I believe are regulated differently than commercial ads.
Unless the decree requires specific language, I imagine that this is likely to hurt Samsung more than Apple. Something like
The courts agree Samsung Galaxy is less cool and inferior to iPad. Samsung too incompetent to copy.
The courts agree Samsung Galaxy is less cool and inferior to iPad. Samsung too incompetent to copy.
Who knows, the output could be anything.
What about this:
http://twitpic.com/a93gn3
Samsung does not copy our design.
Look carefully:
On one hand, a high-powered tablet made to meet your desires.
The other, a square photo frame with a weak and outdated OS.
Thank you Samsung for making better tablets than ours.




Member since:
2011-03-22
Unless the decree requires specific language, I imagine that this is likely to hurt Samsung more than Apple. Something like
The courts agree Samsung Galaxy is less cool and inferior to iPad. Samsung too incompetent to copy.
When Samsung objects, Apple will simply point out that they are are merely complying with the courts.