Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jul 2012 18:32 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527398
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia?
by winter skies on Fri 20th Jul 2012 01:05
in reply to "RE: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia? "
As I pointed out earlier in this thread, Nokia sold 125M smartphones (and of those 4M were Lumias). Nokia doesn't need to be #1 to be a viable competitor in the smartphone market.
These numbers speak very clearly about how well their strategy is working out. It is a complete disaster and anyone trying to deny its gravity is out of his mind.
I could understand and be supportive of a bold strategy if it hadn't thrown away all that was good in Nokia and basically outsourced all software development to others (read: MS - I'm not even talking about Accenture taking care of the last days of Symbian). It was a crime - I'm repeating myself, but I can't believe this is happening before our eyes, and above all before the eyes of Nokia's BOD and the Finnish government.
A software and hardware company (with a promising new OS on two promising new high-end smartphones among the other things - along with the good location-based services we all know and Elop will always blabber about) - has been downgraded to OEM status in an era when pure manufacturers are struggling more and more. Insane. If I were a Finn, I'd be mourning over a company that still is an European pride and over the loss of workplaces.
I still hope things will turn around and I'd like to see what a change in this clueless top management would bring.
RE[3]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia?
by tomcat on Fri 20th Jul 2012 04:03
in reply to "RE[2]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia? "
These numbers speak very clearly about how well their strategy is working out. It is a complete disaster and anyone trying to deny its gravity is out of his mind.
Read for comprehension, and try to pretend that you're not a Google or Apple fanboy for a minute. Again, Nokia sold 125M smartphones. That's not a "complete disaster", unless you only define success as being #1 or #2 in the smartphone market; which Nokia doesn't need to do, at this stage of the game.
Edited 2012-07-20 04:06 UTC
RE[3]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia?
by dsmogor on Fri 20th Jul 2012 23:01
in reply to "RE[2]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia? "
RE[2]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia?
by D-Master-D on Fri 20th Jul 2012 05:38
in reply to "RE: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia? "
Lolz - you keep saying that!
Nokia sold 10.2 million smartphones - not 125 million! :-O
The company's sales revenue increased 45% to $123 million for the quarter - I think that's where you keep getting mixed up.
125 million smartphones would be more than Apple and Samsung combined ;-D
RE[3]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia?
by dsmogor on Fri 20th Jul 2012 06:41
in reply to "RE[2]: Where is the "wow factor" with Nokia? "





Member since:
2006-01-06
As I pointed out earlier in this thread, Nokia sold 125M smartphones (and of those 4M were Lumias). Nokia doesn't need to be #1 to be a viable competitor in the smartphone market. What they need to do is scale their costs down to meet their market share; then, they'll see positive growth in revenue.