Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jul 2012 18:32 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Nokia just posted its quarterly results - including shipped devices - and it's not looking good. Massive losses, sales dropping, and no growth in Lumia sales in the US. The company is losing money hand-over-fist, and with Windows Phone 8 still months away, the company warns the next quarter will be just as bad.
Thread beginning with comment 527422
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Well...
by MollyC on Fri 20th Jul 2012 03:38 UTC in reply to "Well..."
MollyC
Member since:
2006-07-04

I don't know that Nokia + Android = success.
Android ain't working out for HTC (compare this year's HTC earnings to last year's). In fact, Android is only working out for Samsung.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Well...
by allanregistos on Fri 20th Jul 2012 05:35 in reply to "RE: Well..."
allanregistos Member since:
2011-02-10

I don't know that Nokia + Android = success.
Android ain't working out for HTC (compare this year's HTC earnings to last year's). In fact, Android is only working out for Samsung.


HTC != Nokia. Nokia is known for hardware quality, ie reliability and longevity of a Nokia phone. Nokia is better at designing and producing quality smart phone(look at N9) and their feature phones are known to be of top quality. So going to Android route is guaranteed a success, since Nokia is very well-known brand and the Android name is everywhere. The reason why people buying phones here(at least in my country), is because a phone's OS is Android, regardless of the manufacturer, the evidence is that we now have LG, and a lot of less known brands and local brands that are in the hands of the user because of Android, and Nokia wasn't ONE among them. So Nokia made itself irrelevant in the smartphone era. While they do produce Smartphones with Symbian, but those are VERY expensive, and people now starting to look to cheaper smartphones. I think Nokia did not do their market research.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Well...
by pos3 on Fri 20th Jul 2012 06:11 in reply to "RE: Well..."
pos3 Member since:
2010-06-25

Android + Nokia would have been a runaway success in one of its biggest market India.

Unless wp8 sells in low $100-$200 Nokia is done in India.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Well...
by cdude on Fri 20th Jul 2012 09:12 in reply to "RE: Well..."
cdude Member since:
2008-09-21

As you write yourself past year Android worked well out for HTC. They lost huge but its not related to Android vs other platform cause they where rather successful with Android before. Its just that competition, Samsung, took over.

It can happen anytime soon, and as we saw with HTC very fast, that Samsung loses and somebody else takes over the Android lead. All have the same Android, so its the final product, execution and the sales-process which make the difference, not the platform.

In contrast to WP7. There its ALSO the platform. WP7 just failed and so even if you do 100% correct and have 100% of the WP7 sales ruling out all other WP7 competition, you lost. There is nothing Nokia can do but lose. Its not there platform. They cannot change that.

With,Android it would all depend on Nokia. They would have the possibility to be better then competition. Be Android number #1 and win unlike be WP7 number #1 and lose. That is the difference between success and failure, between being able to win and doomed to fail, between shaping your future yourself or depend on somebody else to do it for you. Nokia cannot modiy WP7, they cannot make the upgrade-path from WP7 to WP8 Lumia work, they cannot do anything. With Android they could. Such kind of one-way dependencies where you build up the health of your company on the good will of somebody else are never a good idea. We see why.

Nokia is fighting the wrong war. They fight for ecosystem market share rather then for Nokia market share. They cannot win that war but only lose cause even when WP wins Samsung and HTC are still there but on WP rather then Android (in fact Samsung and HTC sell WP7 devices cause they are not so stupid to fight the wrong war).

Edited 2012-07-20 09:24 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Well...
by B. Janssen on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 13:43 in reply to "RE[2]: Well..."
B. Janssen Member since:
2006-10-11

Nokia is fighting the wrong war. They fight for ecosystem market share rather then for Nokia market share. They cannot win that war but only lose cause even when WP wins Samsung and HTC are still there but on WP rather then Android (in fact Samsung and HTC sell WP7 devices cause they are not so stupid to fight the wrong war).


That's an astute observation, but it also means that Nokia could have only escaped the relegation to mere handset maker by staying on a self-owned platform. If Nokia went with Android they would be an Android one-trick-pony instead of a WP one and fight for the Android platform. To escape this lockdown they would have to offer both, Android and WP handsets. This would mean that Nokia becomes something like another Samsung. Now, that doesn't look too bad at first glance, but 1. that's not what Nokia thinks it is and 2. that's not what Nokia can be.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Well...
by dsmogor on Fri 20th Jul 2012 20:47 in reply to "RE: Well..."
dsmogor Member since:
2005-09-01

MS is eating other Android OEMs margins with their extortion campaign while Samsung is pushing aggressively on the HW price level. All while Apple trolls HTC out of their most important market (is HTC able to sell One on US already). No doubt they have problems.
Nokia on the other hand would have been mostly immune to all that.

Reply Parent Score: 2