Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527634
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Open Source Is Mortal
by s-peter on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 06:05
in reply to "Open Source Is Mortal "
The article is about software which is fully functional and has user interest. In such case, with open source, even if the original developers lose interest, or there is a platform change, others will carry on development.
I don't think people have issues with open source projects dying if they never reached usable state and/or have no user interest; such project will die open source or otherwise, and that's just the way of life.
Is Black Mesa developed in an open source model? I couldn't find the source repository/download anywhere.
RE: Open Source Is Mortal
by kallisti5 on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 02:45
in reply to "Open Source Is Mortal "
The Open Source project can die.
Developers lose interest. Users lose interest. Platforms change.
The code base is incomplete, corrupted or too complex to be usable.
Developers lose interest. Users lose interest. Platforms change.
The code base is incomplete, corrupted or too complex to be usable.
This is bullshit.
Open source projects never die, they *can* fade away due to lack of interest (or incomplete, bad design, etc). *However* as long as a distribution network exists and users can find a 15-year old zip file with the sources to the application they need, projects can live on.
Experience: I've unearthed quite a few dead GPLv2 open source projects, modernized them, and placed them on life support at places like github.
Edited 2012-07-23 02:46 UTC
RE[2]: Open Source Is Mortal
by lucas_maximus on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 19:10
in reply to "RE: Open Source Is Mortal "
Open source projects never die, they *can* fade away due to lack of interest (or incomplete, bad design, etc). *However* as long as a distribution network exists and users can find a 15-year old zip file with the sources to the application they need, projects can live on.
Except we use quite a few old open source projects for Windows where the source cannot be found, the authors cannot be contacted or have moved on and we are SOL, it taking a lot of money to move our intranets.
So it not really true.
RE[2]: Open Source Is Mortal
by zima on Thu 26th Jul 2012 02:05
in reply to "RE: Open Source Is Mortal "
Open source projects never die, they *can* fade away due to lack of interest (or incomplete, bad design, etc). *However* as long as a distribution network exists and users can find a 15-year old zip file with the sources to the application they need, projects can live on.
Experience: I've unearthed quite a few dead GPLv2 open source projects, modernized them, and placed them on life support at places like github.
Experience: I've unearthed quite a few dead GPLv2 open source projects, modernized them, and placed them on life support at places like github.
And you can put Egyptian mummies (or Lenin) on display ...doesn't make them particularly non-dead (though, in a way, much less dead than some scattered bone fragments, sure)




Member since:
2010-01-07
The Open Source project can die.
Developers lose interest. Users lose interest. Platforms change.
The code base is incomplete, corrupted or too complex to be usable.
The money isn't there. The staffing isn't there.
The project depends on assets the programmer is ill-equipped to supply.
Black Mesa, for example, has a perfectly serviceable engine --- what it doesn't have is a game.