Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
In the News Okay, so this is entirely new to me. Sparrow is was an email client for Mac OS X and iOS (and Windows), which brought a decent Gmail experience to these platforms - as opposed to Apple's own not-so-good Gmail support and Google's Gmail iOS application which, well, is just a webpage. Google has now acquired Sparrow, and basically all hell has broken loose, to the point of Rian van der Merwe writing that 'we' lost "faith in a philosophy that we thought was a sustainable way to ensure a healthy future for independent software development, where most innovation happens".
Thread beginning with comment 527680
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Gone fishing
Member since:
2006-02-22

At the end of the day the developers need to bring money home, and there is none to be had when your software is 100% available for the others to take, and you cannot sell services on top of it.

This is the reason why most open source desktop applications suck


You make a reasonable point, Lunduke has being saying similar things on the Linux action show. I agree Open-source development is likely to be faster / better if funding is more obvious and available.

Then you blow it out of the water by saying Open-source software is crap (sorry you specify desktop) as presumably you realize that your argument would immediately fail if we considered server software. Now VLC / Mplayer being crap, I believe not, I can think of many proprietary media players that are far worse Winamp, Realplayer or even Windows media player. GIMP is good it may not be as good as Photoshop but is better than most proprietary graphics editors. Last time I used Nero it sucked, maybe it has improved but for the burning I do I don't need or want bloatware or the rest of the crap that comes with Nero.

Finally you make a reasonable point about how Libre office has made good progress due to funding from Sun - raising the point that funding is important.

Good luck with the finding of quality Windows shareware sorting through the maleware and porn, personally I pleased it's something I don't do anymore.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

Good luck with the finding of quality Windows shareware sorting through the malware and porn

And through crippleware (after a while, people find that the software is severely limited), closed formats, inability to audit or improve the software and a lot of factors that originated the word "shameware".

personally I pleased it's something I don't do anymore.

Me, too :-)

Reply Parent Score: 1

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Actually a lot of the best open source software is for Windows or can be run on Windows quite easily.

There is a lot of good software for Windows that can be bought that doesn't include malware or any other bollox.

It frequently overlooked and everything that seems to be a Linux advocate thinks it is still the late 90s.

f--king please.

Stop telling lies for Linux.

Edited 2012-07-22 17:07 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Now VLC / Mplayer being crap, I believe not, I can think of many proprietary media players that are far worse Winamp

Winamp is far superior with music ...and just a front-end to external playback mechanisms with video (which can be worse or better than the internal playback mechanism of VLC... http://kyon.pl/img/9115.html http://kyon.pl/img/17235.html ).
Also, I wouldn't call MPlayer (which I prefer for video BTW) a desktop application, it sucks at that - it's more a library used by front-ends, analogous to Winamp & external.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18



While VLC has it's problems I've never seen it screw up that badly.


Eh, I don't really see a noticeable difference except maybe on the subtitles.

it's more a library used by front-ends, analogous to Winamp & external.


I prefer SMPlayer to VLC and it is pretty sweet on both Linux and Windows.

Edited 2012-07-26 16:29 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2