Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
In the News Okay, so this is entirely new to me. Sparrow is was an email client for Mac OS X and iOS (and Windows), which brought a decent Gmail experience to these platforms - as opposed to Apple's own not-so-good Gmail support and Google's Gmail iOS application which, well, is just a webpage. Google has now acquired Sparrow, and basically all hell has broken loose, to the point of Rian van der Merwe writing that 'we' lost "faith in a philosophy that we thought was a sustainable way to ensure a healthy future for independent software development, where most innovation happens".
Thread beginning with comment 527700
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Open Source email clients
by arpan on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 15:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Open Source email clients"
arpan
Member since:
2006-07-30

Examples of this happening in the past. It takes a lot of effort, although something like kickstarter may be useful.

In the past I've seen stats from open source projects which mentioned that less than 1% of users donate to the project. That's not a lot.

Reply Parent Score: 3

Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

something like kickstarter may be useful.
In the past I've seen stats from open source projects which mentioned that less than 1% of users donate to the project. That's not a lot.

There are a lot of stats, a lot of projects and a lot of percentages. For example, we could talk about Humble Indie Bundle 'V', getting more than 5.000.000$ from people who liked it. A better product is more likely to get money than another. But this discussion that I started was not about it.

The key is that if someone (*1) has the possibility of doing themselves the improvements (*2) or contracting someone (*3), it's better than not having this possibility. That's the key of that discussion that I started.

(*1) A user, a community of users, a company, a country, etc.
(*2) It can be a minor one, a medium one, a big one, etc. The bigger the improvement, the bigger will be the benefit for people.
(*3) It can be the original authors or some developer/s to negotiate the work with.

Reply Parent Score: 2

arpan Member since:
2006-07-30

Sparrow was developed by a small team in a year.

If you have the budget, you can just hire a team of developers to recreate it with the features you need. Takes a little more effort, but just because there is one closed source app, it does not prevent you from creating another closed or open source app.

Reply Parent Score: 2

westlake Member since:
2010-01-07

For example, we could talk about Humble Indie Bundle 'V', getting more than 5.000.000$ from people who liked it.


The Humble Bundle is eight Indie games which have had broad exposure and good reviews on the Windows platform and sells for 5 to 10 percent of retail list.

The return is typically $8 from the Windows gamer.

3/4 of the total.

$12 from the Linux gamer.

1/8-1/4 of the total.

Purchases are framed as "donations" --- with the return split between charities, developers, and the Humble Bundle itself. I don't believe HB has ever published a chart of the breakdown.

The Humble Bundle is a promotion. It builds awareness of Indie gaming.

But the direct cash return to the developer is small.

Reply Parent Score: 2