Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527707
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by arpan on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 18:54
in reply to "RE: Comment by lucas_maximus"
Except nobody is saying that support is guaranteed. What is said is that the possibility of support is there. The chance that there is support depends on developer interest and user interest. I daresay that in this particular case, Sparrow would have no problem finding new contributors.
Right, and so, even if the source code is not available, how is that preventing you or anyone else from recreating the app? It will just take a little longer.
Sparrow was built by a small team in a relatively short time. If the market really exists, then someone else can do it again. They don't even have to be very creative, they can just copy what Sparrow did. And Google's not going to sue them, especially if it is an Open Source clone of Sparrow.
RE[3]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by _txf_ on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 19:33
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by lucas_maximus"
True, there is nothing preventing anybody from creating a clone. Having the source however, would reduce the barriers to entry and reduce any losses in the community whilst the clone is being created. By the time the clone has reached the level of the clonee then it is probably too late...
RE[2]: Comment by lucas_maximus
by lucas_maximus on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 19:00
in reply to "RE: Comment by lucas_maximus"





Member since:
2008-03-17
Except nobody is saying that support is guaranteed. What is said is that the possibility of support is there. The chance that there is support depends on developer interest and user interest. I daresay that in this particular case, Sparrow would have no problem finding new contributors.