Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527712
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: "the dangers of closed source"
by tidux on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 15:13
in reply to "RE: "the dangers of closed source""
RE[3]: "the dangers of closed source"
by lucas_maximus on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 19:05
in reply to "RE[2]: "the dangers of closed source""
RE[3]: "the dangers of closed source"
by zima on Sat 28th Jul 2012 23:07
in reply to "RE[2]: "the dangers of closed source""
There's nothing that says you can't charge for support on FOSS. Red Hat, Inc. made a BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS doing that last year.
Yeah, Red Hat did. Meanwhile, Mandriva or SUSE are mostly gone.
(plus, the support model has some issues - it kinda promotes software which needs that support, and/or which is used in the relatively few fields which fit with and can justify ongoing support costs)




Member since:
2009-08-18
Oh more open source zealot bollox.
Seriously all the evils things that you are highlighted regarding privacy etc. are pretty easy to discover with a copy of fiddler/wireshark and a decompiler/hex editor.
The rest, how dare someone make a living by working to support a newer set of features, which take time and money to create.
This sort of rubbish continues because fundamentally a lot of open source proponents don't actually understand how software works ... they think they know how it works and think FOSS is the be all and end all.
Come back to me when you have actually been through a few death marches.
Edited 2012-07-22 17:14 UTC