To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's not about sexy, more about usable - and Ribbon was a great improvement in that regard, also greatly streamlining things; it's much cleaner than pretty much anything else of comparable capabilities (initially opposed largely just because of the usual in people resistance to change), so you kinda couldn't be further from the truth... And overall, Win UI is one of more consistent ones for the past 17 years, since Win95.
(but then, with you it seems that aiming at groupthink is usual / "oh I will just yell at MS a bit" - and the amount of OSS circle-jerking here can be sometimes suffocating)
Edited 2012-07-30 00:03 UTC
Indeed, Microsoft has really made a dubious turn. From "stick every function conceivable in there" 180 towards "pretty stuff, show only stuff you need most of the time". Finally a move in a direction I appreciate but leaving behind too much usability. While I appreciate it (just the direction) I'm glad most people won't
Apple still seems to me unsurpassed in providing the easiest to use interfaces, uncluttered. You can find everything where you'd expect.
Still a Linux user...




Member since:
2009-10-31
It boils down to usability. Apple usually keeps the eye candy usable (With the exception of that change in folders from OS X Tiger). Microsoft seems to change stuff every other OS release for the sake of doing it.
People just give meaning where there is none.
I personally loathe the peanut gallery of the Win 8 Start screen.