Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Jul 2012 00:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Well, advertising is also kinda big in music (~radio model) or films (similarly)
And as for Motorola... I don't know, I'm not sure if buying a stumbling (for the past few years) phone maker is the best thing to do when wishing to diversify. Probably Google also had (at least largely) in mind the Moto patent chest, and/or they were forced a bit (remember how, a year ago and about a week before the Google+Moto announcement, Motorola CEO said they can go with patents after other Android makers, and adopt WinPhone?)