Linked by diegocg on Sun 22nd Jul 2012 19:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527798
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Perhaps this article sheds some light on it:
https://lwn.net/Articles/479841/
Also, here is technical background on the 'suspend blocker' controversy: (very technical, kernel dev-style)
https://lwn.net/images/pdf/suspend_blockers.pdf
edit: nvm the second one, it's what you linked to in the first post
Edited 2012-07-23 06:24 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-24
AFAIK the original controversy was that the Linux devs thought Android's suspend mechanism (suspend blockers) was too aggressive and therefore the Linux devs instead created 'autosleep' and 'wake locks' which offers a similar functionality but in a more flexible(?) way and are hoping that the Android devs will use these features instead of suspend blockers, they've also made the API mimic the suspend blocker API so as to make it as easy as possible for the Android devs to pick up.