Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527875
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: "the dangers of closed source"
by lucas_maximus on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 19:05
in reply to "RE[2]: "the dangers of closed source""
RE[3]: "the dangers of closed source"
by zima on Sat 28th Jul 2012 23:07
in reply to "RE[2]: "the dangers of closed source""
There's nothing that says you can't charge for support on FOSS. Red Hat, Inc. made a BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS doing that last year.
Yeah, Red Hat did. Meanwhile, Mandriva or SUSE are mostly gone.
(plus, the support model has some issues - it kinda promotes software which needs that support, and/or which is used in the relatively few fields which fit with and can justify ongoing support costs)




Member since:
2011-08-13
Keep sucking on that FUDgesicle. There's nothing that says you can't charge for support on FOSS. Red Hat, Inc. made a BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS doing that last year.